Really... You actually think there is a valid argument in that? Van Helsing is to Twilight what Bruce Lee is to Spongebob.

Avoid both of them...

Van Helsing... Twilight is for 16 year old girls...

Van Helsing... Twilight is for people who can't think...

Avoid both of them but Van Helsing is better

Van Helsing. In twilight vampires are a bunch of pale fags and the warewolfs are douchebag fags. In van helsing the Dracula is badass and the vamp chicks are psycho. the warewolfs don't try to butfuck you when they fight and the storyline is bearable.

twilight is the biggest pile of shit going. there's no point to it. its more for girls that don't have a grip on reality and live in cloud cuckoo land. so i think that Van Helsing is better

while i do agree that van helsing was better but... the best of the two is like placing first place in the special olympics. the only real way to win is to not be in the race at all by not being special. both movies are "special" in their own unique way. neither of them is Citizen Kain or Apocalypse Now.

I'd have to say Underworld has the best of recent times. However, within the question you asked, most definitely Van Helsing. The "vampires" in the Twilight Saga are just disgraceful. They are apparently made of stone/ice which is false. Vampires are still human and have the same body make-up as a normal mortal being. They aren't any different other than the fact that their heart no longer beats making their blood stagnant and is why they have a pale blueish tint. The "Werewolves" aren't even that. They are actually retarded shape-shifters that only know how to shift into that of a wolf. It's kinda sad you if ask me.