#Original #Politics #Funny #Gaming #Tech #Interesting #Science #Creative #Comics #Memes #Quotes #Sexy


#News #Animals #Celebs #Photography #History #Space #Music #Movies #Sports #TVShows #SciFi #Ask
liechtenstein flag - Rule 34


I dare anyone here to come up with evidence of pornography of the Liechtenstein flag. I just wanted to see if there was actually an exception to Rule 34

If anybody proves me wrong, they'll get 70% of my next post
Report this topic to moderators This post already reported
-3Remove
-2Remove
-1Remove
+54
+1Remove
+2Remove
+3Remove
Views: 28166
Posted: 2010-04-12 07:42:38

Responses (78) // Sorted by points

Psst.
  • Ruleb - replied 2010-04-12 08:52:28
    +27
    Liectenstein - Rule 34


    I fapped to it so it counts. Points!
    Reply
    Report
    • Bekenel - replied 2010-04-12 10:49:40
      +1
      bloody hell
      i wasn't expecting that
      you get the points
      Reply
      Report
      • Ruleb - replied 2010-04-12 11:14:48
        +2
        That's why it's Rule 34 not Guideline 34 :D
        Reply
        Report
    • godsp33d - replied 2010-04-12 13:21:18
      +1
      damn, their truly are no exceptions
      Reply
      Report
  • iTzDeVOUrr - replied 2010-06-07 16:55:29
    +5
    1275961363546 - Rule 34
    Reply
    Report
  • Dragkyre - replied 2010-04-12 18:50:39
    +3
    rule 34 proves the existance of god, there is god porn so god must exist
    Reply
    Report
    • Ruleb - replied 2010-04-13 05:14:06
      +6
      A)That's a faulty syllogism. Rule 34 only states that if it exists then there will be porn of it. That is not the same as saying that if there's porn of it, it must exist. It's like saying "all grass is green, therefore everything green must be grass". Doesn't work.

      B)The concept of God exists, and there may be porn of the concept of God (artistic interpretations and such), but I've yet to see any porn featuring the actual almighty getting jiggy.
      Reply
      Report
      • Dragkyre - replied 2010-04-13 07:49:46
        +1
        yes but if he didnt exist there wouldn't be porn of it, found this on (1 & 2) so you;re pretty much arguing the anons
        Reply
        Report
        • Ruleb - replied 2010-04-13 08:02:14
          +1
          No you're not getting it, it only states that everything that exists has porn of it. That doesn't mean there CAN'T be porn of things that don't exist AS WELL.
          Reply
          Report
          • Dragkyre - replied 2010-04-13 14:30:58
            +1
            in what logic? if it doesnt exist why would there be porn of it, and if there was porn of soemthign that "didnt exist" that thing would now exist
            Reply
            Report
            • Ruleb - replied 2010-04-14 03:58:35
              +7
              Im so confident that unicorn porn exists somewhere I'm not going to even bother looking for an example, but I'm fairly sure unicorns dont exist.

              Are you saying that if I draw some pornography of something it will pop into existance? If so I'm off to create some flying car porn.

              All I'm saying is that if you take a 'true' statement such as "If it exists there's porn of it" it doesn't necessarily remain true if you reverse the statement. "If there's porn of it it must exist" is an entirely new statement that you're making, not rule 34.
              Reply
              Report
              • destroyer124 - replied 2010-06-18 12:52:35
                +1
                i agree sir well played lol maybe you should spell it out 2 him? lol
                Reply
                Report
                • devilduck - replied 2010-12-20 14:14:32
                  +1
                  rule 34 1 - Rule 34
                  Reply
                  Report
    • noodle - replied 2010-04-12 20:18:38
      +5
      Theres god porn?
      Reply
      Report
      • CallMeGoogle - replied 2010-06-06 20:51:47
        +5
        28 And the angel came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

        31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.

        Luke 1:28&31
        Reply
        Report
        • defmid26 - replied 2010-06-18 12:47:45
          +1
          biblical win!
          Reply
          Report
      • Dragkyre - replied 2010-04-13 03:50:36
        +1
        indeed
        Reply
        Report
  • OfficerKarl - replied 2011-04-08 13:42:02
    +2
    Hopefully this answers all questions and settles all arguments about Rule 34 and the related Rule 35.

    Always happy to help.

    Reply
    Report
    • MalverdeAl100 - replied 2011-04-08 13:47:55
      +1
      I was looking for this list. I lost mine when i went time traveling
      Reply
      Report
      • OfficerKarl - replied 2011-04-08 13:58:09
        +1
        Don't you just hate it when that happens?
        Reply
        Report
        • MalverdeAl100 - replied 2011-04-08 14:08:06
          +1
          Tell me about it. If i had a nickel for everytime that happened i'd have 35 cents
          Reply
          Report
          • OfficerKarl - replied 2011-04-08 14:19:44
            +1
            Damn... I wish I had that much money...
            Reply
            Report
  • Albane - replied 2010-04-12 09:12:57
    +1
    I always thought Liechtenstein was a country made up for use in "A Knight's Tale". I am sure someone has paused that movie and fapped to the girl with the see through tops.
    Reply
    Report
    • Bekenel - replied 2010-04-12 10:52:24
      +1
      Liechtenstein is just between Switzerland, Austria and Germany, It's a very small country so isn't noticed much
      Reply
      Report
    • Zink - replied 2010-06-06 20:55:09
      +1
      haha i thought it was made up for that movie too. i also thought kazakstan was made up for "Borat".
      Reply
      Report
      • destroyer124 - replied 2010-06-18 12:53:43
        +1
        legit lol nice
        Reply
        Report
  • DennisDee - replied 2010-04-12 17:41:00
    +1
    one day we will find an exception.
    Reply
    Report
    • drakenguard - replied 2010-04-12 20:10:28
      +2

      this i got from dannyl
      Reply
      Report
      • drakengard85 - replied 2010-06-07 10:24:01
        +2
        actually..... i saw that whole post. they did find some. worst day ever
        Reply
        Report
      • Dragkyre - replied 2010-04-13 03:51:14
        +1
        i hope to god that its an exception...
        Reply
        Report
      • DennisDee - replied 2010-04-13 15:27:13
        +1
        haha..
        Reply
        Report
        • Tremp20k - replied 2010-06-07 03:11:51
          +1
          agreed
          Reply
          Report
      • Polygon - replied 2010-06-20 11:11:44
        +1
        Lol someone even tried to sage it
        Reply
        Report
      • CallMeGoogle - replied 2010-06-07 16:07:44
        0
        celebrity pictures rosie odonell mindbleach - Rule 34
        Reply
        Report
        • Dragkyre - replied 2011-03-28 23:46:36
          +3
          i fucking hate you
          Reply
          Report
          • CallMeGoogle - replied 2011-03-29 14:25:10
            +1
            Exceptions: Rule 34 has none.
            Reply
            Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-07 02:12:01
    +1
    dfff - Rule 34



    this can has exception!
    Reply
    Report
    • Ruleb - replied 2010-06-07 02:19:17
      +8
      untitled - Rule 34
      Reply
      Report
    • Math - replied 2010-06-07 03:18:12
      +1
      SKINT teenagers are being forced to use crisp packets as contraception because they cannot afford condoms, a sexual health expert said today.
      Peter Greenhouse said many of the country's poorest youngsters admitted to improvising with contraceptives - such as cling film - for sex.....

      Read the full thing [url=http://http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article153728.ece/]Crisp Packet Condoms[/url]
      Reply
      Report
      • Dannyl - replied 2010-06-07 04:44:21
        +1
        I would pay so much to meet the kid who thought a crisp packet would be a good idea...
        Reply
        Report
        • Jackylegs - replied 2010-10-15 15:20:53
          +1
          the corners would hurt coming out....
          Reply
          Report
      • Ruleb - replied 2010-06-07 10:50:15
        +1
        Choice of brand is vital in those circumstances. The consequences for the young lady (or gent, I'm not judgmental) if your crisps of choice came in a Pringles can, dont bear thinking about.
        Reply
        Report
        • Math - replied 2010-06-07 11:02:28
          +1
          Salt and Vinegar sprang to my mind!
          Reply
          Report
          • Ruleb - replied 2010-06-07 11:05:01
            +1
            Ooooooh Worstershire Sauce :O
            Reply
            Report
            • Math - replied 2010-06-07 11:06:44
              +2
              Either way it'll end up like Prawn Cocktail!
              Reply
              Report
              • Ruleb - replied 2010-06-07 13:39:22
                +1
                Haha. Flawless victory.
                Reply
                Report
                • Polygon - replied 2010-06-20 11:12:40
                  +1
                  Wouldnt the outside of the packet kind of scratch?
                  Reply
                  Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-07 13:31:30
    +1
    well... i tried =P
    Reply
    Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-18 11:57:21
    +1
    remote rt u50 dsr large - Rule 34



    give this another try
    Reply
    Report
    • defmid26 - replied 2010-06-18 12:50:32
      +3
      dude, have you never seen a porno where the girl gets off with a remote? you are sheltered my friend
      Reply
      Report
      • destroyer124 - replied 2010-06-18 12:55:51
        +1
        that or they refuse to believe it lol
        Reply
        Report
    • iGreenDay - replied 2010-09-30 17:42:57
      +1
      channel 3.....4.....
      Reply
      Report
  • dogggy - replied 2010-06-18 14:08:33
    +1
    Its amazing what a country's flag and some imagination from a teenager made you all post today. Ethier way +3 because it was kinda creative...
    Reply
    Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-18 14:35:38
    +1
    honestly i cant say i have seen that... sorry =P... but I will find an exception... !!!
    Reply
    Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-18 14:41:19
    +1
    hmm does Dark Lord Sauron have exceptions
    Reply
    Report
    • Polygon - replied 2010-06-20 11:13:31
      +3
      The eye of Sauron, the Japs-Eye.
      Reply
      Report
      • Ruleb - replied 2010-06-21 06:42:27
        +2
        Are you kidding? All of Middle-Earth is tempted by the prospect of slipping their finger into Sauron's ring.
        Reply
        Report
        • Tremp20k - replied 2010-10-14 09:52:33
          +1
          google shabby blue
          Reply
          Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-20 09:33:45
    +1
    have i beat the ultimate rule 34? did i find the exception
    Reply
    Report
    • Jackylegs - replied 2010-10-15 15:23:20
      +1
      Are you serious? For the better part of the entire series, middle earth is ruled by a giant orange pulsing vagina!

      How'd you miss that?
      Reply
      Report
      • Nightfang - replied 2010-10-31 02:11:01
        +1
        isnt it supposed to be an eye? O.o wtf goes through your mind everyday? XD
        Reply
        Report
        • Jackylegs - replied 2010-11-02 02:30:30
          +1
          of course it's supposed to be an eye, by the vertical pupil thing just looks a vertical vagina thing to me.
          Reply
          Report
  • nbafan10 - replied 2010-06-20 18:25:03
    +1
    i have googled it.....nothing
    Reply
    Report
    • Tremp20k - replied 2010-10-14 09:53:29
      +1
      alright try shabby blue with idk lotr im kinda ashamed i know this
      Reply
      Report
  • triclebickle - replied 2010-10-13 21:00:24
    +1
    rule 35 everytime
    Reply
    Report
    • arrowdodger7 - replied 2010-10-14 10:08:40
      +1
      I know of rule 34, which cannot be broken. But what is this rule 35 of which you speak?
      Reply
      Report
      • triclebickle - replied 2010-10-14 12:47:57
        +1
        if porn of it does not exist it will be made
        Reply
        Report
        • arrowdodger7 - replied 2010-10-15 01:27:11
          +1
          ahh. that probably could go into rule 34 as a second statement.
          Reply
          Report
          • triclebickle - replied 2010-10-15 13:36:35
            +1
            well thats the jist of rule 35
            Reply
            Report
            • arrowdodger7 - replied 2010-10-15 15:05:32
              +1
              still...
              Reply
              Report
              • triclebickle - replied 2010-10-15 15:48:14
                +1
                it's rule 35 there are 2 rules in ThE GaMe 34 and 35
                Reply
                Report
  • Jackylegs - replied 2010-11-02 02:29:19
    +1
    facepalm21 - Rule 34
    Reply
    Report
  • Leooo - replied 2010-11-02 02:38:18
    +1
    when one road's red, use the (adjacent and) "royal" way!
    Reply
    Report
    • NonNobisSolum - replied 2011-03-28 22:25:44
      +1
      you mean "if the river runs red, take the dirt track instead"
      Reply
      Report

Leave a reply

Upload files