I dare anyone here to come up with evidence of pornography of the Liechtenstein flag. I just wanted to see if there was actually an exception to Rule 34
If anybody proves me wrong, they'll get 70% of my next post
Report this topic to moderatorsThis post already reported
A)That's a faulty syllogism. Rule 34 only states that if it exists then there will be porn of it. That is not the same as saying that if there's porn of it, it must exist. It's like saying "all grass is green, therefore everything green must be grass". Doesn't work.
B)The concept of God exists, and there may be porn of the concept of God (artistic interpretations and such), but I've yet to see any porn featuring the actual almighty getting jiggy.
No you're not getting it, it only states that everything that exists has porn of it. That doesn't mean there CAN'T be porn of things that don't exist AS WELL.
Im so confident that unicorn porn exists somewhere I'm not going to even bother looking for an example, but I'm fairly sure unicorns dont exist.
Are you saying that if I draw some pornography of something it will pop into existance? If so I'm off to create some flying car porn.
All I'm saying is that if you take a 'true' statement such as "If it exists there's porn of it" it doesn't necessarily remain true if you reverse the statement. "If there's porn of it it must exist" is an entirely new statement that you're making, not rule 34.
I always thought Liechtenstein was a country made up for use in "A Knight's Tale". I am sure someone has paused that movie and fapped to the girl with the see through tops.
SKINT teenagers are being forced to use crisp packets as contraception because they cannot afford condoms, a sexual health expert said today.
Peter Greenhouse said many of the country's poorest youngsters admitted to improvising with contraceptives - such as cling film - for sex.....
Read the full thing [url=http://http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article153728.ece/]Crisp Packet Condoms[/url]
Choice of brand is vital in those circumstances. The consequences for the young lady (or gent, I'm not judgmental) if your crisps of choice came in a Pringles can, dont bear thinking about.
It's your #0 visit here. It's about time to stop lurking!
Sharenator.com is all about sharing, voting, competing and simply having fun. Who's the best at posting the coolest stuff? Join now and benefit from all of sharenator's features available only to members. Be the Sharenator!
I fapped to it so it counts. Points!
i wasn't expecting that
you get the points
B)The concept of God exists, and there may be porn of the concept of God (artistic interpretations and such), but I've yet to see any porn featuring the actual almighty getting jiggy.
Are you saying that if I draw some pornography of something it will pop into existance? If so I'm off to create some flying car porn.
All I'm saying is that if you take a 'true' statement such as "If it exists there's porn of it" it doesn't necessarily remain true if you reverse the statement. "If there's porn of it it must exist" is an entirely new statement that you're making, not rule 34.
31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.
Luke 1:28&31
Always happy to help.
this i got from dannyl
this can has exception!
Peter Greenhouse said many of the country's poorest youngsters admitted to improvising with contraceptives - such as cling film - for sex.....
Read the full thing [url=http://http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article153728.ece/]Crisp Packet Condoms[/url]
give this another try
How'd you miss that?