RE: Adolf Hitler's Paintings
I've heard a lot about his paintings. but I've never actually seen them before. What I find weird is that they've gained a lot of notoriety for being such bad paintings; looking at them now, they don't seem so bad. Maybe the standard of quality just took a steep downward climb since then.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:47:05 Reply
Definition of bad art: anything conforming to an aesthetic that also kills 6 million people. As in "I don't know about art, but I do know that bigotry kills"
If you do not think these paintings are bad, you are looking at them wrong.
If you do not think these paintings are bad, you are looking at them wrong.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:21:25 Reply
You're right. These paintings aren't the best. I enjoy looking at photographs of dead kikes. They are much more pleasing.
Posted: 2009-02-24 07:39:06 Reply
you know, just because he was a evil person, doesn't make his paintings evil. they are actually quite good, i mean, most people have a hard time drawing stick figures. also, i dont see how the paintings themselves killed six million people. I am sure that if you didnt know who the author of these paintings were, you would think they were okay.
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:04:15 Reply
This is a single comment thread from the following topic:
That's why some people say he should have been an artist rather than a dictator.
Posted by: pragma 1 year ago Responses: 128 15/00/7