Adolf Hitler's Paintings

Sharenator.com > Featured Posts in Pics Category > Adolf Hitler's Paintings

g25206


g25207


g25208


g252010


g252011


g252012


g252013


g252014


g252015


g252016


g252017


g252018


g252019


g252020


g252021



Edit Post
Views: 233,459
RATE
50
Posted: 2008-04-22 15:08:01
Continue exploring Sharenator:
Flash
Pics
Videos

Responses (97) / Sorted by points

justkelly
Rank: #379
Hm...interesting. The technique is certainly competent, but entirely rote. Like someone who picked up one of those "How to Draw" books, diligently learned its techniques, and then never strayed an iota from that point. Not an artist, but perhaps he could have been a professional illustrator, doing work for books, magazine articles, etc.
Of course, as has been pointed out, regardless of whether he became a dictator or not, it would have been *someone*. The socioeconomic forces at work were too strong; someone would have bubbled up out of them. Bad times breed apparatchiks.
All that being said, however, that is one weird lookin' german shepherd, or whatever that's meant to be. S'all crooked and stuff.
Posted: 2008-04-24 07:01:25 Reply
brianwww
Rank: #415
Ya, like you can paint better. Obviously your political views and hatred for hitler lead you to discriminate against his artist ability. The fact is that Adolf Hitler was a very talented artist and you know nothing about art. I hate hitler for who he was but you cant deny that he was an excellent artist. You probably prefer art by Jackson Pollock or that type where a couple of blue squares on a black background is brilliant. You people fuck up the art world.
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:28:58 Reply
rkinn09
Rank: #488
you dont need to go to school to "learn" art, art comes from within and is an expression in emotion. and its you that fucks up the world, putting people down for their opinions and ideas, just like hitler
Posted: 2009-06-02 12:07:54 Reply
alex123
Rank: #49
right on brian. i hate hitler for who he was aswell, but he was a very good artist
Posted: 2009-06-18 06:35:49 Reply
yeah someone would have been bubbled up but not a bigoted dictator
Posted: 2009-05-29 13:30:06 Reply
sammy
Rank: #509
@Leminnes: You need to watch this clip:www.doubleviking.com/videos/page0.html/7585.html
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:23:53 Reply
Leminnes
Rank: #377
That was awesome. As much as I agree with that, him getting into art school I can imagine would've done at least some good. And if not, well piss on me, then. :P It's not like we'll ever know, anyway. Because apparently it is impossible to go back in time:www.livescience.com/technology/070307_time_travel.html
Posted: 2008-04-23 18:06:29 Reply
Adam
Rank: #660
Not impossiple, using the 5th dimension its possible to fold in on the 4th dimension (time) and travel backwards and forwards. Atoms and other subatomic particles are capable of doing this, but we haven't been able to figure out how to do it with ourselves yet. Yet.
Posted: 2008-04-23 23:21:47 Reply
"Imagining the Tenth Dimension" is an interesting read from a philosophy standpoint, but it doesn't have very much to do with the actual dimensions of space and time. Atoms aren't subatomic, and anyway subatomic particles don't travel in time other than in the same way we do (Unless you want to view antiparticles as time-reversed regular particles, but in which case our interaction with them only takes place on a time-forward basis).
Posted: 2008-04-26 17:21:24 Reply
Nice. Someone who actually knows something. Like knowing that 90% of paintings claimed to be by AH are fakes. He didn't paint still life for example.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:17:20 Reply
nate23
Rank: #431
Ironic that the third to last picture is of the Hofbrau house which was the setting of the first official meeting of what eventually became the Nazi Party.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:45:08 Reply
Hazi
Rank: #511
I've heard a lot about his paintings. but I've never actually seen them before. What I find weird is that they've gained a lot of notoriety for being such bad paintings; looking at them now, they don't seem so bad. Maybe the standard of quality just took a steep downward climb since then.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:47:05 Reply
Definition of bad art: anything conforming to an aesthetic that also kills 6 million people. As in "I don't know about art, but I do know that bigotry kills"
If you do not think these paintings are bad, you are looking at them wrong.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:21:25 Reply
You're right. These paintings aren't the best. I enjoy looking at photographs of dead kikes. They are much more pleasing.
Posted: 2009-02-24 07:39:06 Reply
you know, just because he was a evil person, doesn't make his paintings evil. they are actually quite good, i mean, most people have a hard time drawing stick figures. also, i dont see how the paintings themselves killed six million people. I am sure that if you didnt know who the author of these paintings were, you would think they were okay.
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:04:15 Reply
Even if he did do something good like helping the economy what good was it after the war when a lot of Germany was destroyed? Besides he didn't really help the economy i mean sure he gave people jobs but that was because the whole Jewish population was sent to concentration camps, most of the men became soldiers and those who got jobs were in construction and taking care of the city. He didn't do good for anybody. @ fools: You wouldn't be able to write that if Bush was a dictator.
Posted: 2008-04-24 16:10:31 Reply
how can someone so cruel and vile, not bothering about human life what so ever... to think of the mass murders he commited in te name of cleansing his society.. see such beauty ?? i dont get it
Posted: 2008-04-25 04:19:06 Reply
Coplin
Rank: #653
Steven Pressfield made an interesting comment in his book, "the WAR of ART" saying that because of resistance it was easier for Hitler to become a Dictator than an artist.
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:31:53 Reply
Nope, that'd be because he couldn't paint.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:22:03 Reply
brianwww
Rank: #415
You are an idiot. Why dont you post some of your paintings shithead. Hitler was a great artist, just a shitty human.
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:30:36 Reply
jordo
Rank: #655
The conditions and the times of 1920 and 1930's Germany caused the second world war. If it wasn't Hitler it would have been someone else.
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:56:36 Reply
lunarship
Rank: #657
Hitler originally worked for German intelligence, and "went native" investigating the subversive organisation the NSDAP. It's likely admission to art school might have made little or no difference. He was chosen as party leader for his skills as an orator and ruthless desire for power; had a more highly skilled political animal - Hess, for example - been in charge, the results may have actually been a longer war and many more dead.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:17:36 Reply
Greg
Rank: #334
Not true. Hitler used the depression, and the previously existing Anti-Semitism in Germany (as well as many other countries of the world) to fuel the war. He was, quite litterally, mentally unstable and found great joy in the knowledge that his country was at war. He felt betrayed when the treaty of Versailles was signed, thus ending the first world war (at that point known as the Great war), and wanted to continue. Of course Hitler's war made millions of jobs for all participating countries, including Germany (whos dollar: the mark, was only a millionth of the american dollar at the time) and saved the economy, so if you want to talk of balance, you could say that Hitler balanced out the Great Depression. This is of course, in no way excusing Hitler's actions, who deserved to be destroyed in his own death camps, were he not so much of a coward as to kill himself before being found.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:23:46 Reply
OMGWTFLOL
Rank: #433
But also you got to take account that the Holocaust was not only a genocide, they used the people's hair for mattress stuffing and skinned them to make wallets and lamp shades. Hitler mass marketed the deaths of the people he was exterminating, and from that made a lot of profit. That was not economic salvation, it was pure insanity.
Posted: 2008-04-24 11:59:07 Reply
While historical evidence exists of the economic depression of Germany brought on by the first world war, and Hitler is documented to use that as one of his many platforms, I find it amusing to hear you speaking of his feelings as if you had personal experience of them. Humans find it difficult enough to know what someone else is thinking, let alone feeling, without that person telling us, and even then we have to take into account their intentions. Yet you know the feelings of a man long dead. Congratulations, you will probably end up with a Nobel prize, given your extraordinary discovery.
Sarcasm aside, Hitler made Germany what it is today, and no one will argue the strength of its economy. Same can't be said for the land of the free, ey?
And are you really so naive and immature to say killing oneself is the act of a coward? Have you ever been faced with death? It takes a strong person to come to the logical decision that the ride is over, and there's no point in hanging around anymore. He controlled his destiny from the beginning to the end. He didn't kill himself because he was a whiny American Emo kid, he made a logical decision. But then I suppose that is the American definition of madness, right? Or should we ask Dr Phil?
Posted: 2008-04-25 02:19:31 Reply
jc242
Rank: #522
The primary contribution Adolf Hitler made to German society was that he totally destroyed Germany: in 1945, Germany was literally in ruins. Millions upon millions of people were dead. Millions more were homeless and starving (in Germany, not just in the countries Germany invaded). Germany had no economic, no coherent political system, no communications system, no libraries, no schools, no hospitals. In a sense German society did not exist in 1945 and had to be rebuilt from scratch to become modern Germany.

One might mention things that Hitler did ostensibly to benefit Germans before 1939, but faced with the legacy of the National Socialist dictatorship and what state Germany was in in 1945, such things are laughable at best as "contributions to society."
Posted: 2008-04-25 14:02:04 Reply
JONY
Rank: #524
Sorry to sy it, but any STUPID EMO is willing to comit suicide. Do you think they are Geniouses?
Posted: 2008-04-27 03:50:06 Reply
Greg
Rank: #334
I happen to have read several Biographies of Adolf Hitler, and do not take credit for everything that was written, but i must say. Yes. I do stand by my previous statement that Hitler did save Germany and the economy of the Americas, despite all of the horrific deaths. rather than everyone mention all the negatives of everything, i thought i should point out the positives however grim that may sound. However unforetunate it is, war always stimulates and skyrockets the economy of countries. More jobs are needed to fill in the spaces of those who left for war. During the second world war, Women went to work. They gained the right to vote, and made their first giant leaps to equality. After the war, Automobiles were sold dirt cheap, and struggling companies changed their main products to war supplies, and were spared from bankrupcy.
And as for the suicide, it may take logic to know when to commit suicide, but it is still a cowardly way out.
Posted: 2008-06-05 14:04:32 Reply
Wheeee! I thought Americans were STUPID. I didn't know HALF of it!!!
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:27:17 Reply
Adolf Hitler wrote his own autobiography, which contained his feelings on the war and has had several modern day "psychoanalysts" pour over his history to find out what made him tick. Im sure if you looked on google, you'd certainly find a good several pages on what theyve found. Remember that when things didnt go his way, Hitler threw himself to the ground and bit the carpet. He laughed maniacally when he received news of extermination or slaughter. Eyewitnesses to these events testified this. He was insane. He liked the war. He liked the slaughter. These are facts.
I have been faced with death, and I deserved it. I didnt think of suicide.
Did Saddam Hussien commit suicide? No. He received his death penalty like so many others on death row. Commiting suicide to escape a death sentance is cheating justice. If you're going to die, you might as well give the people some form of closure and justice. Unless you are a monster like Hitler.
Posted: 2008-11-18 13:55:25 Reply
Greg
Rank: #334
sorry, previous comment directed to jordo's comment
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:25:38 Reply
Even if it had been someone else besides Hitler, there's at least some chance that over 12 million people would not have been exterminated by the Nazi scum. The mass genocide wasn't critical to German dominance and probably did more to hurt their chances for Pan-European domination than it did to help.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:26:22 Reply
If only GW Bush had gone to art school instead of...
Posted: 2008-04-23 18:19:50 Reply
sprech
Rank: #513
He was rejected from the art school in Austria because he was really only good at art where buildings and landscapes were the subject. He lacked the talent for drawing and painting people. He said the art school was run by the Jews and this is where some people believe came his hatred for this group. Germany was in a very desperate economic situation when Hitler came along He found out what the people wanted and gave it to them. He did help Germany economy at that time. I feel sorry for the innocent that were killed though!
Posted: 2008-04-23 18:21:49 Reply
alecseo
Rank: #661
If i could go back in time, i'd make sure Hitler'll actually get the job done. Epic Fail.
Posted: 2008-04-24 01:34:11 Reply
I understand he wanted to be an Artist but was not accepted at University.
Posted: 2008-04-25 21:24:42 Reply
Prodnose
Rank: #676
Too bad Hitler wasn't a marginally better artist, and could earn his living at art. It might have saved the world a lot of trouble.
Posted: 2008-04-30 18:56:40 Reply
Did someone forget that over 6 million jews, disabled people, elderly people and anyone else not suited to the Natzi Nordic race were systematically tortured, performed medical experiments on, and died in gas chambers, shot or abused by any other insane method? If you want to go ahead and admire his art, then you just go ahead and do that....I suppose that you would be the type to defend a serial killer and debase the victims. I for one, have no illusions about Hitler and what he did. I also know that my family fought during World War Two to make sure that you have the right to do so. I know him for a mad man, and I thank God every day that he was never allowed to become a world power. If he had, how many of you would be sitting there talking about the poor soul that was manipulated into becoming THAT mad man. Evil is Evil....you should be more careful about what you think and say.
Posted: 2008-05-01 14:24:29 Reply
drloboto
Rank: #110
How is enjoying a person's art a statement that you agree with his beliefs?
Posted: 2009-03-05 11:57:12 Reply
Lol. Not that i think the holocaust was a good thing. To the contrary, my ancestors were directly affected by it. I agree with you that Hitler was evil. I just find it odd that you think that because some of his art appeals to me, I am somehow supporting his actions. Most of the people on here are not condoning his actions, so why are you getting all uptight?
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:13:30 Reply
brianwww
Rank: #415
This is about art, not the holocaust. If these paintings were given to anyone and asked to critique with the artist anonymous I guarentee that the response would be favorable, except maby for the german shepard drawing,ha, a little off, but not bad. And after all, mad, crazy people usually make the best artists.
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:37:10 Reply
brianwww
Rank: #415
Did you see the 3rd painting from the bottom. Its beautiful. I wonder if he was telling the truth that the art school he was denied acceptance to was run by jews who rejected him because he was not jewish.
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:41:27 Reply
robert
Rank: #681
His paintings are not important.
His action and influence are.
Posted: 2008-05-18 21:34:24 Reply
Mindze
Rank: #6
Nice. That's a true talent.
Posted: 2008-04-22 15:11:49 Reply
Leminnes
Rank: #377
If there is one thing I could change in History, it would be forcing the freaking art school to let Hitler in. That might not stop Hitler from becoming a Nazi and ruining the lives of millions of people but I'm sure it would've helped the chances of him just living the rest of his life painting cheesy ass paintings of flowers, buildings, dogs, and mildly good looking woman.
Posted: 2008-04-23 00:08:18 Reply
ghartnet
Rank: #430
Paul, that is exactly right. Its the slight flick of the steering wheel which determines what and how we leverage our own "special talents"; whatever they may be.
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:55:59 Reply
mindhaze
Rank: #654
Don't be pissed that everyone else fell for his shit.
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:42:59 Reply
Paul
Rank: #9
It's amazing how just one thing can adjust the history. Either a painter or evil dictator.
Posted: 2008-04-23 00:21:48 Reply
The world lines have a way of correcting themselves, or even rebounding. Removing Hitler might put someone even more evil in his place, probably Josef Mengele. Coincidentally, this is the exact same reason nobody will remove Bush from the timeline, either.
Posted: 2008-04-23 16:57:52 Reply
lettieric
Rank: #656
Your last part of the comment is not even closely correct, Bush is a dumb ass not a dictator; we want him out of office because he hasn’t done anything for our country except war, less jobs, and two recessions. Hitler killed millions he might be evil, but to the country he did a lot to make the economy of Germany flourish, do not compare an idiot who is screwing our country for someone who was a heartless animal, but did much for his people. Bush doesn’t...
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:05:06 Reply
Actually, the German currency became so diluted and worthless that it was cheaper to burn their money for heat. They printed endless amounts of their currency and Inflation skyrocketed. Germany even attempted to drop Counterfeit British currency over Britian to try and dilute the power of their buying power as well.
Posted: 2008-04-23 17:52:28 Reply
While Bush does indeed appear to be a dumb ass, let us never fool ourselves that the "leader of the free world" *cough* gets there by his own means alone. There are obviously many concerns behind the throne, and Bush is a perfect puppet: malleable, ineffectual and, as you said, a total dumb ass.
I take exception to your flagrant misuse of the word evil, but this is not the forum for that discussion. However, using the words "heartless animal" is something I have to question. How many animals have you encountered that butchered other sentient beings "just because", or for their own gain, without need for the flesh? How many animals have you encountered that did not respond to a gentle touch and a soft voice? I realise it is an expression, but these small words poison minds and program people subconsciously to regard animals as nothing but vermin.
Please choose your words carefully.
Posted: 2008-04-25 02:34:39 Reply
Too right Zayne. 'Heartless Animal' is an insensitive expression. Whereas 'dumb ass', why that's an eloquent phrase, well chosen and well placed.
You lot... you DESERVE George W Bush.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:33:35 Reply
fools
Rank: #939
@lettieric:
really? he's not a dictator? why, because he doesn't (directly) attack his own people? he doesn't have to. he sends them to iraq. bush is the quintessential definition of a dictator. he does what he wants, he breaks laws if he feels like it. he holds our troops on tours beyond the limitations of their agreements with the armed forces. blackwater is not held to us law. he forces our imperializm on countries that never attacked us. he breaks international law. and most importantly, we will do nothing to stop him, will we? we are just one person, what can we do? pathetic.
Posted: 2008-04-23 19:46:54 Reply
check out the slideshow of these images
www.sharenator.com/Adolf_Hitlers_Paintings_in_a_slideshow/
Posted: 2008-04-23 19:47:10 Reply
Mindze
Rank: #6
Strange to say but I think Hitler was better evil than Stalin.
Posted: 2008-04-25 14:34:06 Reply
jennifer
Rank: #525
third one from the bottom is sick..

Jennifer
www.firenzedascoprire.com
Posted: 2008-04-28 11:39:31 Reply
drloboto
Rank: #110
Or a better artist at the very least.
Posted: 2009-03-05 12:08:34 Reply
Hitler was an ok artist. you need to be brilliant to stand out on an international landscape. Now he was a brilliant orator, and had a knack for accumulating power. Ever think what would've happened if we just let him go? Germany never attacked the United States directly, Japan did. So we bomb the hell out of Japan, why would we have sent troops to Germany? Sure killing people is bad, but its really none of our business.
Posted: 2008-04-25 15:23:08 Reply
tele
Rank: #962
1st) Art?.. what art?.. these are just some decorative images. Use the word sparingly and appropriately.

2nd) Animal? Hitler was an animal and evil? Stop this naive and irresponsible stuff. It's not animals and devils that destroy our civilization and bring mass death and horror. It's us = people and our social/political systems in which YOU are part of.

It's really depressing to read many of the comments here..
Posted: 2008-04-28 02:45:02 Reply
drloboto
Rank: #110
I agree. I believe we should take the blame as humans instead of dehumanizing him in an attempt to shift the blame.
Posted: 2009-03-05 12:11:27 Reply
brianwww
Rank: #415
You are an idiot and know nothing about art. look at the 3rd painting from the bottom. Neither you nor noone you know could paint that. Maby its true what hitler said that the jews ran the art school he was denied from. But do yourself a favor and never critique art again, it makes you seem like a retard.
Posted: 2009-04-30 12:46:02 Reply
marrishka
Rank: #705
hi i like hitler
Posted: 2008-06-11 10:20:36 Reply
marrishka
Rank: #705
hi i like all the comments on here
Posted: 2008-06-11 10:24:00 Reply
I have a painting by A.Hitler for sale if interested contact
charliesden@hotmail.co.uk
Andy
Posted: 2008-08-14 12:29:18 Reply
I actually think his art is reasonably good, as far as landscapes and buildings go, his grasp of the human form is not perfect.

I do think that folk tend to dismiss his paintings and drawings because he was a dictator and mass murderer.

I sort of wish he did end up as an artist rather than a dictator, and instead of spreading evil and pain, gave some good and beauty to the world...but that's how things turn out.

It must be said, I also think Winston Churchill was quite a good artists also, though I do favour Hitler's slightly...Churchill was better at drawing man, but I prefer a lot of Hitler's landscapes to Churchill's.

To the person that seems to think it's "evil" or an "endorsement" of Nazism to admire, buy, talk about or even look at a Hitler painting, may I point out that I think many folk here probably have relatives that fought in the war; I myself had a biological grandfather who fought in the war who I have been deprived of knowing because of it.
Please learn that a "thoughrolly evil chap" can also be a good artist, or orator or musician, or poet or whatever. No one is one hundred percent evil all the time.
Posted: 2008-10-24 17:27:59 Reply
Oh per-lease. To start with his paintings are awful. Secondly, aesthetics is a values-set. If you buy into the look and feel of his paintings, how far away are you from admiring the buildings? The uniforms? How about those Nuremberg Rallies? They were really stirring weren't they? And I mean the notion of purity in ITSELF isn't bad is it? We all like pure coffee after all?
The point is, this is the DEFINITION of bad art. If you didn't know what bad art was before, look at this. Now you know. That's what it looks like. If you didn't know this was bad art, then you obviously didn't know dick. Art that aligns itself with an aesthetic that can kill 6 million people; that's bad. Okay? You want a definition of bad? That's it.
As for Churchill. He's the one person who inspired a nation to stand up to Hitler. His was the voice that inspired Britain to resist and to keep fighting, to keep open the platform that allowed America to enter the war and invade France. He is the very definition of a modern political hero. You want a definition of good art, go look at his. Now check out the differences because they are not to be found in the TECHNIQUE!!! (Heaven's Sake)
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:44:35 Reply
drloboto
Rank: #110
Oh per-lease yourself. Art is deifned as "decorative or illustrative elements in printed matter". I believe these fit that definition. As for the bad part,these are not horribly made (I.E Bad). Therefore, this is well made (I.E Good) art.
Posted: 2009-03-05 12:04:42 Reply
By the way, there are fifteen paintings shown here. Twelve of them are fakes--not by Hitler at all.
Posted: 2008-10-26 18:45:48 Reply
OniB
Rank: #1179
not bad
makes me wonder if they didn't have hitlers name on them would there be so much negativity surrounding them

hey bobthebuilder, you do realise that stalin killed a whole lot more people than hitler ever did right? the fact remains that it was the russians, not the americans or british that won the war in europe and put an end to hitler 3rd reich, so thank comrade stalin
and churchill was no saint either, ordering the bombings of german cities after a german bomber missed its target dropping its load on london.
have a read and wake up, history is written by the winners

www.lewrockwell.com/orig/raico-churchill5.html
Posted: 2008-12-04 08:12:43 Reply
paradox
Rank: #1282
Adolf Hitler was only a figurehead.Just as Bush or Hussien.They act out the will of the people.The real criminals are the historians and the biographers who make capital out of war.The other criminals are the faceless capitalists who make fortunes out of controlled and manipulated internecine murder.As for hitlers paintings they are only his representations of feelings just as cubism is to Picasso,or fauvism is to dali etc.Art is simply any represntation of the artist and observer.In otherwords everyone is an artist since we all represent what we percieve.Arthas no parameters ,borders or creed.
Posted: 2009-01-19 10:24:49 Reply
If theses master pieces are really done by AH
BEWARE OF ALL OTHER PAINTERS !!!
Posted: 2009-02-03 05:47:13 Reply
skuleader
Rank: #94
To accept the creative is to accept the mad. Becareful how much you like his paintings.
Posted: 2009-02-03 06:19:06 Reply
Flaraen
Rank: #26
If he had been a painter, it would have saved a lot of people's lives
Lets take a moment to consider how great art is
Lets take another one to think about WHY Hitler didn't become an Artist
Posted: 2009-02-25 11:44:43 Reply
drloboto
Rank: #110
Hitler was evil. He was also a painter. Therefore, all painters are evil.
Posted: 2009-03-05 11:59:56 Reply
sel14
Rank: #1398
You can see that the flower are dead, there is no life, we know that the flower is a simbol of love...
Posted: 2009-03-25 18:16:01 Reply
matt
Rank: #1422
I think the paintings are lovely. Some of your are so skeptical you can not juge art if you know who it is by. I found a lot of mundane remarks about his paintings. If it is the one beuatiful thing he left the world do not bash it.
Posted: 2009-04-10 22:39:30 Reply
Wow, finally something I agree with. I cant believe people cant look at something without some kind of bias. Really, he was an exceptional painter, not my favourite, but he is on the list. I, on the other hand, in no way condone his actions or his political, and personal ideology.
Posted: 2009-04-26 21:17:23 Reply
Certainly a better painter than Prince Harry.

He was a talented self taught painter and maybe Hitler was excluded from art school because of class snobbery but so what? Who says that intelligent and talented people can't also be mass murderers? Charles Darwin, God?

I am just glad Einstein made it to university!
Posted: 2009-04-23 18:29:06 Reply
goop
Rank: #603
They Are Gay! because the most evil man in history drew them!
And the team the prson above me supports is the best
Posted: 2009-04-27 03:52:52 Reply
how inciteful
Posted: 2009-04-29 20:39:17 Reply
moosrofl69
Rank: #52
he shoulda went to art school...
Posted: 2009-05-29 13:08:14 Reply
Jofus1992
Rank: #254
Well some of yall gave really intulectual answer and yall r gonna make me sound dumb but i guess his paintings are ok
Posted: 2009-06-02 10:14:00 Reply
Everjaded
Rank: #13
So many long posts. Here's a short one...
Posted: 2009-06-03 08:03:25 Reply
Jenks
Rank: #59
i hate the jews!!!!
Posted: 2009-06-18 02:18:16 Reply
shacow
Rank: #47
pretty good, still doesn't make me think differently about that evil, evil man.
Posted: 2008-12-12 10:54:04 Reply
Pretty good artist but way better as a dictator. The worst thing he did was declaring war on America. How stupid was that!!! He already was at war with England, France, Russia, Poland, Yugoslavia etc.
Posted: 2009-05-22 09:12:48 Reply
hahaha
Rank: #62
if you remember correctly dip shit it wasn't hitler who declared the war on america... it was japan and we all know what happened to them. Hitler just had to back them up because he needed them to pressure china korea and russia.
Posted: 2009-05-31 21:40:16 Reply
Jofus1992
Rank: #254
Yeah we did declare war with him know your stuff before you say it
Posted: 2009-06-02 10:14:41 Reply
Jofus1992
Rank: #254
Yeah we did declare war with him know your stuff before you say it
Posted: 2009-06-02 10:14:45 Reply
Jofus1992
Rank: #254
Yeah we did declare war with him know your stuff before you say it
Posted: 2009-06-02 10:14:48 Reply
slifer21
Rank: #3126
I LOVE HITLER KILL THE DIRTY GOD DAMN JEWS THEY ARE THE DEVIL'S SPAWN AND SHALL BE BURNED AT THE STAKE FOOR THEIR IMPOTENCE
Posted: 2009-06-18 07:12:14 Reply
waterfae
Rank: #105
SLIFER21

Alright where to start. How about decency: behavior or an attitude that conforms to the commonly accepted standards of what is right and respectable. It doesn't matter how you feel, what you think, what matters is your effect on people. Every letter you typed was full of hatred. I'm glad you love hitler your probaly a wanna-be hard core bad-ass that couldn't quite make it and decided to become a present day nazi-skinhead and say forget decency and humility the world can conform to me well heres the thing skinhead,it wont.It will in fact KICK YOUR ASS.

Next puplic behavior,your comment was made to offend people and cause a rise in someone. your a attention whore. thats why you say you "love hitler" and joined the stupid little nazi following. Well i'm sorry to say hitler is dead the nazi party died out with him 68 years ago the war is long over, the wall came down, and germany is known for it's beer and the voltswagon.so what you are is indecent bald attention-whore who is has a crush on a dead man. Hitler is SPINNING in his grave at having a follower such as you. Go home ask mommy for a hug and see a shrink because i'm pretty sure you've got mommy or daddy issues.

Impotence:unable to perform sexual intercourse, usually because erection of the penis cannot be achieved or sustained

Impudence: The quality of being offensively bold.


so i guess you can say the jews should be burned at the stake for the imability to sustain a hard-on but I say you buy a dictionary.
Posted: 2009-06-18 10:11:20 Reply
This comment is below viewing threshold (Show Comment)

Post a response

ImagePosted by:
pragma
Rank: #5

BEST of Pics Category

View TOP posts of: Today, This week, This month, All time

BEST of All Categories

View TOP posts of: Today, This week, This month, All time