Related Posts
-
emma watson or miley cyrus?
+90 points / pics -
Emma Watson is a man!!
+109 points / pics -
Dude fakes his party - awesomely photoshops it with celebrities
+222 points / pics -
Preacher Phil Snider On Gay Rights
+15 points / videos -
Czech elections
+9 points / misc -
--==||Celebrity Evolution||==--
+333 points / pics -
15 Surprising Photos of Game of Thrones Actors Out Of Character
+24 points / pics -
Pics. all around #5
+55 points / pics -
Celebrity look a likes
+89 points / pics -
Most epic brand melt down on Facebook, Ever.
+26 points / misc
+ expand all
Pretty much sums it up.
Look with your eyes, not your hands.
I have to say, as a girl, I do think she's really pretty. Lucky girl :)
for some reason peeping at women is perfectly acceptable in photographs (nude or not), if you think only the nudity is wrong, consider this:
is peeping at a pretty girl with binoculars any worse if the girl is naked? as opposed to watching her clothed? (assuming she doesnt know shes being watched).. its still peeping, and youre a peeping tom.
judging from these photographs... looks like the photographer was using a nice zoom lense. look at picture 8... she doenst seem happy that someones snapping pictures at her... notice shes squinting... hes not close by. he's peeping at her. and youve got a front row seat of the peepers view.
if you caught some guy snapping pictures of your sister from far away with a zoom lense, to "appreciate" her beauty while shes wearing a tight shirt or a swimsuit, and finding it online in posts labeled "nice boobs!" im sure youd see it differently.
My point: