RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

Sharenator.com > Pics > Movie production costs compared: Cost per second > RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

+1
arryboy81
Rank: #2244
It seems the more a film costs the more mediocre it is and film makers are a self indulgent bunch who make films to please themselves and if it makes money, keep the format and pretend its a new film.
Posted: 2009-06-21 11:46:11 Report Reply

This is a single comment thread from the following topic:

Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

+48 points
Category:  Pics
Why you shouldn't blink in a movie theater
Posted by: Paul 1 year ago Responses: 22 1/10/3

Suggestions

How much would it cost to be Batman?How much would it cost to be Batman?
(+24)
Your car's drink cost more than yoursYour car's drink cost more than yours
(+41)
THE IMPOSSIBLE HAS HAPPENED - A NEW TWILIGHT MOVIE NEXT YEARTHE IMPOSSIBLE HAS HAPPENED - A NEW TWILIGHT MOVIE NEXT YEAR
(+18)
Dissapointment From The Last Airbender MovieDissapointment From The Last Airbender Movie
(+29)
The scariest movie all time?The scariest movie all time?
(+21)
The evolution of movie robotsThe evolution of movie robots
(+63)
More: If Movie Posters Told the TruthMore: If Movie Posters Told the Truth
(+39)
Funny Movie ReviewFunny Movie Review
(+6)
The General Academy Award Winning Movie TrailerThe General Academy Award Winning Movie Trailer
(+17)
Worldwide Broadband speeds and costsWorldwide Broadband speeds and costs
(+12)

Top Sharenators  |  Sharenator on Facebook  |  RSS Feeds  |  Credits  |  Report abuse/SPAM  |  Terms Of Service  |   Contact Us

Flash index · Search stats
© Sharenator.com