RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

Sharenator.com > Pics > Movie production costs compared: Cost per second > RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

+2
Names
Rank: #2197
What the hell?
That shit Twilight took the least to produce, and it made more than King Kong?

Retards. All of you.
Posted: 2009-05-15 17:11:48 Report Reply

RE: Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

+3
clabedygab
Rank: #1843
Well, if it makes you feel better, Pattinson was clipped by a taxi while trying to escape from the same mob of screaming fangirls who contributed to that.
Posted: 2009-06-26 19:37:28 Report Reply

This is a single comment thread from the following topic:

Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

+48 points
Category:  Pics
Why you shouldn't blink in a movie theater
Posted by: Paul 1 year ago Responses: 22 1/10/3

Suggestions

How much would it cost to be Batman?How much would it cost to be Batman?
(+24)
Your car's drink cost more than yoursYour car's drink cost more than yours
(+41)
THE IMPOSSIBLE HAS HAPPENED - A NEW TWILIGHT MOVIE NEXT YEARTHE IMPOSSIBLE HAS HAPPENED - A NEW TWILIGHT MOVIE NEXT YEAR
(+18)
Dissapointment From The Last Airbender MovieDissapointment From The Last Airbender Movie
(+29)
The scariest movie all time?The scariest movie all time?
(+21)
The evolution of movie robotsThe evolution of movie robots
(+63)
More: If Movie Posters Told the TruthMore: If Movie Posters Told the Truth
(+39)
Funny Movie ReviewFunny Movie Review
(+6)
The General Academy Award Winning Movie TrailerThe General Academy Award Winning Movie Trailer
(+17)
Worldwide Broadband speeds and costsWorldwide Broadband speeds and costs
(+12)

Top Sharenators  |  Sharenator on Facebook  |  RSS Feeds  |  Credits  |  Report abuse/SPAM  |  Terms Of Service  |   Contact Us

Flash index · Search stats
© Sharenator.com