Movie production costs compared: Cost per second

Sharenator.com > Pics > Movie production costs compared: Cost per second
Why you shouldn't blink in a movie theater

Watching a movie is almost always a good experience. People are working months on one movie so the final product would occupy your attention for a hour or two.

I was eager to find out how much did it cost to make one second of the most popular movies ever produced. The answer is a lot. Blink for a moment and BAM! You've just missed thousands of dollars worth of material.

I'll let the numbers speak for themselves. Scroll down for a graph.

Title Cost per second Revenue per second
Shrek 2 $13,440 $164,845
Titanic $17,094 $158,018
Finding Nemo $15,666 $144,104
Shrek the Third $28,985 $144,738
Jurassic Park $12,467 $120,038
Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace $14,093 $113,274
Spider-Man $19,283 $113,182
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest $25,000 $118,464
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone $13,706 $106,878
The Dark Knight $20,285 $109,859
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix $24,154 $113,310
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith $13,452 $101,042
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull $25,067 $106,590
Independence Day $8,169 $89,041
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets $10,351 $90,956
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire $15,923 $95,108
Spider-Man 3 $30,935 $106,819
Spider-Man 2 $24,691 $96,762
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King $6,349 $74,015
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End $29,761 $95,336
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe $20,000 $82,779
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring $7,532 $69,772
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers $7,100 $69,154
Wall-E $30,612 $90,943
Quantum of Solace $36,163 $90,557
X-Men: The Last Stand $33,653 $73,615
Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines $30,581 $66,264
King Kong $17,164 $45,648
The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian $23,474 $49,254
Superman Returns $22,077 $42,324
Twilight $5,096 $52,330

cost per second - Movie production costs compared: Cost per second


Report   Edit
Views: 203,295
RATE
48
Posted: 2009-05-10 07:57:54
Psst. Share

Responses (22) / Sorted by points

sowhat
sowhat
Rank: #18





clockwork big - Movie production costs compared: Cost per second



(credit: shibagarden, digg)
Posted: 2009-05-10 14:53:41 Report Reply
Clockwork orange ftw
Posted: 2009-10-27 08:33:34 Report Reply
cosbert
Rank: #919
clock work orange = tripppppppppppppy movie
Posted: 2009-11-16 07:10:07 Report Reply
Agreed, the book is awesome too
Posted: 2010-01-10 19:19:37 Report Reply
the50k
the50k
Rank: #322
With all that budget they still manage to make shitty movies. Sometimes I can't help but see this when watching a movie:
http://www.sharenator.com/The_most_accurate_wasted_life_coun
ter/
Posted: 2009-05-10 12:52:45 Report Reply
Thats about how I feel when I watch Twilight
Posted: 2010-01-10 19:20:07 Report Reply
i just shat what was, in essence, a functional scat grenade. it emerged from my anus in one big wallop of a push, and consisted of oatmeal-like diarrhea encapsulated in a hard stool shell. it exploded immediately upon exiting my rectum, and the fecal shrapnel covered the interior of my toilet bowl. anyone got a cigarette?
Posted: 2009-05-10 18:32:48 Report Reply
Names
Rank: #2197
What the hell?
That shit Twilight took the least to produce, and it made more than King Kong?

Retards. All of you.
Posted: 2009-05-15 17:11:48 Report Reply
Well, if it makes you feel better, Pattinson was clipped by a taxi while trying to escape from the same mob of screaming fangirls who contributed to that.
Posted: 2009-06-26 19:37:28 Report Reply
OMG lol .. going to the bathroom is out of the question then
Posted: 2009-05-10 14:36:36 Report Reply
tobz1000
Rank: #3057
I can't help but notice the lower earnings:cost ratios are attached to the better films. Goddamn public.
Posted: 2009-05-11 12:07:43 Report Reply
How do you spend that much money per second!? That shouldn't be possible!
Posted: 2009-06-12 18:04:21 Report Reply
It seems the more a film costs the more mediocre it is and film makers are a self indulgent bunch who make films to please themselves and if it makes money, keep the format and pretend its a new film.
Posted: 2009-06-21 11:46:11 Report Reply
pteer420
pteer420
Rank: #432
How the fuck did Twilight do better than King Kong?
Posted: 2009-06-27 13:56:41 Report Reply
cuz king kong sucked
Posted: 2009-06-29 14:04:07 Report Reply
Kradon666
Kradon666
Rank: #14
Crystal Skull sucked anyways... Money wasted if you ask me.
Posted: 2009-10-05 12:14:07 Report Reply
lordliz1
lordliz1
Rank: #145
ew on the second picture .............just ew
Posted: 2009-10-06 12:56:40 Report Reply
so much money just for a few blinks
Posted: 2009-10-15 10:11:57 Report Reply
wertz3
wertz3
Rank: #176
movies do cost a lot now a days
Posted: 2009-10-30 13:19:34 Report Reply
starr123
Rank: #2538
While farming wow gold is not just killing monsters to collect the coin drops, these changes significantly affect the cost of things on the Auction House and overall "Cost of doing business" in WoW. Garden Furniture
Posted: 2010-05-23 01:32:05 Report Reply
xiclown
xiclown
Rank: #139
5k only for twilight lol
Posted: 2010-01-07 05:01:02 Report Reply
pretyy much its saying fuck gf coming to moviess cuz u cant pay attention and "do things" and watch every sec of it
Posted: 2009-05-11 15:07:06 Report Reply

Post a response

PaulPosted by:
Paul
Rank: #16


Credits:
Darius (50%)