#Original #Politics #Funny #Gaming #Tech #Interesting #Science #Creative #Comics #Memes #Quotes #Sexy


#News #Animals #Celebs #Photography #History #Space #Music #Movies #Sports #TVShows #SciFi #Ask

A question for Sharenators around the world

Sharenator.com Ask A question for Sharenators around the world

How fast sharenator loads for you? Comparing to other websites you visit daily, is it faster or slower? Please mention where you are from too (city, state, country).

This will help us decide if we should put our new server in our current data center or if we should find a data center closer to your home.

Thanks! :)
Report this topic to moderators This post already reported
-3Remove
-2Remove
-1Remove
+42
+1Remove
+2Remove
+3Remove
Views: 3783
Posted: 2009-11-10 04:04:25

Responses (54) // Sorted by points

Psst.
  • avatar
    willwhite007 - replied 2009-11-19 08:19:58
    +12
    Baltimore MD - speed here is all good - faster than our murder rate this year.....
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      SkinnyBill - replied 2010-01-04 10:56:23
      +1
      lol faster than the murder rate :D +1
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    DeutchlandSchnitzel - replied 2009-11-19 06:46:59
    +5
    Oh ja hier in deutschland sehr gut connection auch. GET DOWWWWWN!
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    ItalianoBonjourno - replied 2009-11-19 06:57:39
    +5
    Pyparapypa papa pupi papypa conectione perfekte:D
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    CholoTaco - replied 2009-11-19 07:04:33
    +4
    O no senior internet no home
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Kradon666 - replied 2009-11-19 09:20:07
    +3
    Why do I get the feeling that the three people up top are actually the same person?
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      carlinhosg - replied 2009-11-19 15:34:08
      +1
      word
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    shacow - replied 2009-11-10 04:53:21
    +2
    UK England - 30ms ping to your servers. Working pretty fast here :)

    Keep up the excellent work :)
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      Math - replied 2009-11-10 05:03:55
      +1
      You done the UK for me! I'll not bother!
      Reply
      Report
    • avatar
      Paul - replied 2009-11-10 08:36:36
      +1
      Thanks Shaun :) Bumping this tread so more members could see it. Guys from US? Anyone from Australia?
      Reply
      Report
      • avatar
        matt1584 - replied 2009-11-19 07:36:00
        +1
        U.S. connection is OK. live in Massachusetts, Westfield to be exact...can be slow at times but im at school so...
        Reply
        Report
    • avatar
      minoshman1 - replied 2009-12-07 06:29:42
      +1
      me 2
      Reply
      Report
    • avatar
      SkinnyBill - replied 2009-12-22 06:44:00
      +1
      im in Kent, UK and most pages will load in under a second (post content takes about 3 secs)
      UPDATE: im pinging you now (hope it doesnt DDoS the site lol) and im getting:
      64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=56 ttl=45 time=135 ms
      in general... about 135ms (that ping may look unfamiliar, its a linux ping... im using Ubuntu
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    lovewarandhate - replied 2009-11-19 15:12:28
    +2
    It works good for me! Nice and fast, Belton,MO
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      XxDaminalsxX - replied 2010-04-15 02:50:53
      +1
      nice and fast? that's what she said.
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    ninjapoptart - replied 2009-11-19 18:09:07
    +2
    Tucson, AZ, it works pretty good for me. The videos don't work for me but I think thats because I use a school issued laptop so some things are blocked >:[
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    TrueViking - replied 2009-11-19 18:16:50
    +2
    o-town mn awsome!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    peace - replied 2010-02-06 15:08:13
    +2
    Goes faster than bacon gets eaten=)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Zink - replied 2009-11-10 09:03:52
    +1
    its just as fast as anything for me. indiana, US
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Kradon666 - replied 2009-11-10 11:48:05
    +1
    Jupiter, FL. It loads pretty fast when I'm at home, but when I go to school, the retarded network makes everything really slow.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Grand6Loki - replied 2009-11-10 11:50:57
    +1
    Loads perfectly fine for me. Portland OR. My net is limited at work so sometimes pics load slow but from home it's blazing of my FiOS.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    jesse22 - replied 2009-11-10 15:44:28
    +1
    a bit faster than other sites i go on...canada, ontario ;)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    XxJustPretendxX - replied 2009-11-10 15:45:45
    +1
    I can't complain. I don't mind the speed that it goes at. East Coast USA.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Paul - replied 2009-11-10 16:25:17
    +1
    Now that's cool. Anyone who actually experiences slow page load times?
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Darkhour - replied 2009-11-10 17:15:12
    +1
    Page usually loads fast, pics can sometimes be slow. Waco, TX
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      Tiggy - replied 2009-11-19 11:35:42
      +1
      yeah generally fast but large posts sometimes take longer, but hey, what did you expect?
      Southampton UK
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    wolfman - replied 2009-11-10 17:19:43
    +1
    pics are usually really slow, colorado, usa
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Everjaded - replied 2009-11-10 17:21:06
    +1
    I concur. everything seems fine here in the UK. Above average for sure.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    ricochetrabbit - replied 2009-11-19 06:51:01
    +1
    japan- pretty quick, but some pics and flash are slow b/c of the network filtering
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      CaptinCrunk - replied 2009-11-19 07:23:25
      0
      japan- at the house runs fine
      Reply
      Report
  • avatar
    carlinhosg - replied 2009-11-19 14:53:57
    +1
    C:Documents and Settings\carlinhosg>tracert sharenator.com

    Tracing route to sharenator.com [94.75.214.190]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms bras10-l0.lsanca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.186.10]

    2 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms dist4-vlan50.lsanca.sbcglobal.net [64.161.163.21
    3]
    3 8 ms 8 ms 8 ms bb2-g1-0-1.lsanca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.42.82]

    4 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms ex2-p9-0.eqlaca.sbcglobal.net [151.164.39.185]
    5 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms 151.164.251.214
    6 87 ms 88 ms 88 ms nyk-bb2-link.telia.net [80.91.252.166]
    7 161 ms 211 ms 160 ms ldn-bb2-pos7-1-0.telia.net [213.248.65.93]
    8 169 ms 182 ms 169 ms adm-bb2-link.telia.net [80.91.253.19]
    9 169 ms 169 ms 169 ms adm-b2-link.telia.net [80.91.253.169]
    10 169 ms 169 ms 169 ms adm-evo-i2-link.telia.net [80.91.248.246]
    11 169 ms 171 ms 169 ms leaseweb-ic-126777-adm-evo.c.telia.net [213.248.
    88.198]
    12 187 ms 171 ms 168 ms te9-2.sr7.evo.leaseweb.net [85.17.100.206]
    13 169 ms 169 ms 169 ms eclx.europe.leaseweb.com [94.75.214.150]
    14 168 ms 168 ms 169 ms sharenator.com [94.75.214.190]

    Trace complete.

    C:Documents and Settings\carlinhosg>ping sharenator.com

    Pinging sharenator.com [94.75.214.190] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 94.75.214.190: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=57
    Reply from 94.75.214.190: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=57
    Reply from 94.75.214.190: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=57
    Reply from 94.75.214.190: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=57

    Ping statistics for 94.75.214.190:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 167ms, Maximum = 168ms, Average = 167ms

    Glendale, California on a DSL
    Reply
    Report
    • avatar
      Luke8D - replied 2010-04-07 11:43:26
      +1
      ahh right... i see.. >.>
      Reply
      Report
      • avatar
        TechnoMusic - replied 2010-04-07 16:13:57
        +1
        Haha!
        Reply
        Report
  • avatar
    cmlh2012 - replied 2009-11-19 18:20:24
    +1
    NJ, all good. faster than Facebook, thats for sure
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    stubbornmarshal - replied 2009-12-07 20:34:48
    +1
    I live in Granbury, texas and the site loads up faster than most other sites that I go to. Keep up the good work.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    kacosta9078 - replied 2009-12-21 17:39:55
    +1
    Glendale, Arizona, it actually works really well for me.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Jofus1992 - replied 2010-01-12 18:19:58
    +1
    Well it's kinda fast. Good enough I would say. Maple Hill,NC. A.K.A middle of no where.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    CTUDirector - replied 2010-01-12 18:22:56
    +1
    Like. .5 seconds for a page to load.
    Which is one ping
    [Host tested: www.sharenator.com
    Test performed from: Seattle, WA
    Test performed at: 2010-01-12 23:23:05 (GMT -05:00)
    PING sharenator.com (173.212.215.122) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=104 ms
    64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=104 ms
    64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=103 ms
    64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=104 ms
    64 bytes from 173-212-215-122.hostnoc.net (173.212.215.122): icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=104 ms

    --- sharenator.com ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.944/104.051/104.123/0.295 ms, pipe 2]


    PING sharenator.com (173.212.215.122): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 173.212.215.122: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=91.882 ms
    64 bytes from 173.212.215.122: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=91.896 ms
    64 bytes from 173.212.215.122: icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=91.774 ms
    64 bytes from 173.212.215.122: icmp_seq=3 ttl=49 time=91.790 ms
    64 bytes from 173.212.215.122: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=91.745 ms

    --- sharenator.com ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
    round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 91.745/91.817/91.896/0.060 ms
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    ninjapoptart - replied 2010-01-12 19:47:01
    +1
    It depends, just the homepage will usually load pretty fast for me, a few seconds or more, but if it has gif's, it'll freeze and I get the spinning beach ball of doom (thanks you, Macs)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Geoffro - replied 2010-02-06 15:11:01
    +1
    I'm from Canada and the speed is good. No problems. :)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    justjim - replied 2010-03-17 04:22:43
    +1
    White lightning from my location
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    DennisDee - replied 2010-04-07 11:48:37
    +1
    Muy bien :)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    TechnoMusic - replied 2010-04-07 16:14:24
    +1
    Perfect here. Covina, California
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    xxkisamexx - replied 2010-04-07 16:37:45
    +1
    well since it is my homepage lolz its extremly fast i never wait over 2 secs and its up and its a lil faster than youtube cause utube vids have 2 load so sharenator fast as lightning for me albany, Ga
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    Nightmare - replied 2010-04-15 02:48:10
    +1
    i'm from australia and its loads fine but loading a whole bunch of gifs takes a little while but i'm sure thats my connection nothing to do with u guys :) keep up the fantastic work :P
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    XxDaminalsxX - replied 2010-04-15 02:53:41
    +1
    It runs fast at home. Rydal, Ga US
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    iGreenDay - replied 2010-12-29 19:01:42
    +1
    Sharenator is running slower lately, Austin Texas USA
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    jobyslaysdragonz - replied 2010-12-29 19:06:05
    +1
    super fast- San Benito Texas USA
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    btw32 - replied 2010-12-29 20:04:17
    +1
    Atlanta, Ga 61ms ping
    not as good as Google(21ms ping) lol.
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    mackenzieBizzatch - replied 2010-12-29 20:54:41
    +1
    About 0.5 seconds. (Arlington, TX)
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    castlewarsisawsome - replied 2011-01-09 12:37:00
    +1
    1 or 2 minutes. but it my be my internet access
    Reply
    Report
  • avatar
    fire - replied 2011-04-13 18:09:21
    +1
    oroville,ca and its fine
    Reply
    Report
  • Responses are below viewing threshold (show responses)
    -4

Leave a reply

Upload files